Search Results for "fixed remuneration"

349 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 349 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Unilateral Salary Reduction of Employee by Nagpur Smart City Corporation. HR Policy in Force at Time of Recruitment Governs Service Conditions; Subsequent Unilateral Modification Without Consent Is Arbitrary and Unenforceable.

The petitioner, Ms. Sonali Rambhau Gedam, was employed as an Accounts Officer with Nagpur Smart and Sustainable City Development Corporation (NSSCDCL)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Teachers for Release of Withheld Salary — Non-Payment of Salary Without Justification Violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Court Directs Respondents to Release Salary Within Six Weeks.

The petitioners, four teachers employed at Shri. Deshbhushan High School, Kothali Kuppanwadi, Chikkodi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Rules on Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order on Tenancy Claim Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The decision addresses the validity of the tenancy declaration under Section 70(b) and Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, who claimed to be Watandars, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order passed by the Maharashtra Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Intra-Court Appeal Challenging Single Judge Order That Refused Additional Remuneration to Former Child Welfare Committee Chairperson. Held That Court Cannot Interfere with Agreed Remuneration Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The matter arose from an intra-court appeal filed by S. Rajendiran, who served as Chairperson of the Child Welfare Committee in Puducherry. He challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for Apprentice Development Officers of LIC. Apprenticeship Training Scheme under Section 18 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 does not create employer-employee relationship or right to absorption.

The petitioners, a group of individuals who were engaged as apprentice development officers by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under a t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for LIC Apprentices — Apprentices Act, 1961 Overrides Industrial Disputes Act. Apprentices engaged under a statutory scheme are not employees and have no right to absorption.

The petitioners, engaged as apprentices by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under the Apprentices Act, 1961, filed writ petitions seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Holds Incentive Payments Not Automatically Wages Under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. Inam Scheme Payments Not Considered Remuneration Under Contract of Employment as Employer Reserved Right to Withdraw Scheme.

The dispute arose under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, concerning whether incentive payments known as 'inam' paid to workers under a scheme...