Search Results for "finished goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "finished goods"

162 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 162 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Nov 2025

The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Fire Insurance Claim Dispute — Surveyor's Report Not Conclusive on Non-Accidental Fire, Insured Entitled to Assessed Loss with Interest. National Commission's order upheld regarding adequacy of documents and exclusion of furniture, but modified to include interest from date of claim.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves cross appeals against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (National Commission) dated 10th August 2020. ...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

23 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Customs Classification Disputes Over LCD Panels. LCD Panels Classified Under Chapter Heading 9013.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, Not as Parts of Television Sets or Car Audio Systems Under General Headings.

29 Mar 2023

The appeals involved disputes over the customs classification of imported LCD panels by two assessees, M/s Videocon International and M/S Harman Inter...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.

19 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...

High Court

High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Modvat Credit Dispute — Capital Goods Credit Denial Set Aside. Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 interpreted to allow credit on capital goods used in manufacture of final products, even if not directly used in the manufacturing process.

22 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of various chemical products at its Hazira Manufacturing Complex. The comp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Classification of Non-Ferrous Metal Castings as Ingots Under Entry C-I-29 of Schedule C to Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court held that aluminum castings manufactured by the respondent are covered by the entry for non-ferrous metal ingots, rejecting the Revenue's contention that they are distinct products.

30 Oct 2015

The case involves a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBEC Circular on Brand Rate of Drawback. Court holds that an exporter can claim Brand Rate of drawback under Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995 even after availing All Industry Rate under Rule 3.

1 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Alfa Laval (India) Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Circular dated 30th Decemb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition Against Rebate Claims for Export of Yarn — Revisional Authority's Order Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 35-EE of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the revisional authority has the power to condone delay in filing revision application, and the High Court will not interfere with such discretionary order under Article 226.

3 May 2006

The petitioners, the Commissioner of Central Excise and the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)