Search Results for "fee schedule"

682 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 682 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ad-Interim Injunction on Ground of Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Suit Valuation Dispute Under Section 6 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959

The case involves an appeal filed by Zuberahmed Maqbool Ansari (original Defendant No.2) against an ad-interim order dated 24.09.2020 passed by a lear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Dispute — Rule 55A of MP Motor Vehicles Rules Valid. State can charge separate fee for reserved registration numbers under Section 41(6) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court judgment that had quashed Rule 55A of the Madhya Prad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Court Fee on Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Payable Under Article 4 of Schedule I of Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Appeal is a memorandum of appeal, not an application, thus ad valorem fee applies.

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an order dated 28.08.2015 passed under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 234E of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Levy of Fee for Late Filing of TDS Returns is Valid. The Court held that the fee under Section 234E is compensatory in nature and not a penalty, and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, a practising Chartered Accountant and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the co...