Search Results for "family offences"

4354 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4354 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Appeal Concerning Custody of Minor Child Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. Appeal challenges Family Court's order granting custody to father based on allegations of mother's adulterous conduct and welfare considerations.

The matter pertains to a first appeal filed under Section 47(c) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, challenging the judgment and decree dated 03.03....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Strict Compliance with Child Victim Rights in POCSO Cases. Court Mandates Implementation of Section 40 POCSO Act and Section 439(1-A) CrPC to Ensure Child Participation and Legal Assistance.

The petitioner, a social worker assisting child victims of sexual abuse, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeking enfor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Bail Petitions and Refers Questions on POCSO Act to Division Bench. Single Judge observes conflicting views on Section 35 compliance and refers issues regarding default bail and evidence recording under Section 164 Cr.P.C., doubting Vinay v. State of Karnataka.

The case involved two criminal petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court by the accused, Hanumantha Mogaveera, seeking bail under Section 439 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Family Court Appeal No.13 of 2008 in Divorce Matter. Appeal Filed by Husband Challenges Dismissal of Divorce Petition Seeking Decree on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion.

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, arose from the dismissal of a divorce petition by the Family Court, Aurang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 366A, 344, 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anil S/o Bhayrappa Khairav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTSC-I (POCSO), Vijayapura, in Special Case (POCSO) No.15/2...