Search Results for "faction village"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Seven Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 326, 324 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Unlawful Assembly and Overt Acts Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by seven appellants who were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Appeals by Convicts in Group Assault and Murder Case; Key Eyewitness Accounts Found Suffering from Material Omissions. Evidence of Recovery of Weapons and Common Object Under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149 Re-evaluated.

These four criminal appeals arose from a common judgment and order dated 14 June 2006 passed by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Moharam Riot Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Unlawful Assembly and Common Object. Evidence of Witnesses Found Unreliable and Contradictory, Leading to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 324, 323, 504, 506 of IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment dated 31-10-1995 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sawantwadi in Sessions Case No. 26 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case — No Recovery from Petitioners, Only Co-accused Implicated. Petitioners not named in FIR and no contraband recovered from them, thus Section 37 NDPS Act bar not applicable.

The petitioners, foreign nationals from various countries including Tanzania, Iran, Gujarat, Mumbai, Tamil Nadu, and others, were implicated in a case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Land Dispute Motive Insufficient to Overcome Doubts in Prosecution Case Under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 16th September 1995 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanaba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Procedural Issues. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860, Amid Pathway Dispute and Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with multiple criminal appeals arising from a common occurrence involving a pathway dispute between the prime accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Lacked Completeness and Chain of Events.

The appellant, Pravin Narayan Patil, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of a person and sentenced to life i...