Bombay High Court on Slum Evictions: Contractual Disputes to Be Raised Separately
19 Jan 2026The Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the Apex Grievance Redressal Committe...
Search Results for "extra commercial consideration"
377 result(s) found
Found 377 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Contract Dispute — Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Failure to Frame Issues and Conduct Trial Rendered Decree Unsustainable Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC.
17 Jan 2026The present Commercial Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 09/08/2019 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Jalna, in Commercial Suit No....
- 107
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.
7 Nov 2025The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Decrees Suit in Favour of Financial Advisor in Commercial Summary Suit for Professional Fees — Interpretation of Mandate Letter Options for Success Fee on Cash Sales of NPAs. Court holds that where the Bank exercised option of 100% cash sales, the Financial Advisor is entitled to success fee at the higher rate of 0.50% on cash received, as per option (a) of the Mandate Letter dated 1 July 2017.
25 Feb 2025The Plaintiff, Special Situation Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in providing financial adviso...
- 626
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
20 Apr 2015The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...
- 199
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.
15 Jul 2014The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...
- 213
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration. Parties Impliedly Excluded Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Agreeing to ICC Rules and Zambian Law.
19 Mar 2013The petitioner, Konkola Copper Mines (PLC), a company registered in Zambia, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case. Court upholds arbitral award allowing contractor's claims for hidden expenses and interest, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 Feb 2013The State of Maharashtra, through the Irrigation Department, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengi...
- 95
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court Judgment Dismissing Challenge to Arbitral Award in Bill Discounting Dispute — Contractual Interest Rate of 36% Per Annum with Monthly Rests Upheld. High Court's Upholding of Arbitral Award on Interest Rate Based on Mutual Agreement Between Commercial Parties and Not Opposed to Public Policy.
1 Jan 1970The dispute arose from a bill discounting facility extended by the respondent to a seller (BDDL) and buyer (appellant) of goods. The appellant and BDD...
- 11
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.
1 Jan 1970The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...
