Search Results for "ex-parte decree"

240 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 240 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Money Suit — Service of Summons Valid Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. The court held that the defendant had knowledge of the suit and failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance, upholding the ex parte decree.

The appellant, M/s. CliniRX Research Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant in a money suit filed by the respondent, Bicare Limited, for recovery of mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Extends Time for Payment Under Section 148 CPC Despite Plaintiff's Objection in Consent Decree Default Case. Court holds that Section 148 CPC empowers the court to extend time for payment in a consent decree for reasonable cause, even without the consent of the decree-holder.

The case arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the Defendants (Applicants) to set aside an ex parte decree dated 19 December 2012 in Summary Suit No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree — Decree Set Aside on Condition of Costs. Ex-parte decree set aside as defendant had sufficient cause for absence and application was maintainable under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The appellant, original defendant No.2, suffered an ex-parte decree dated 12.11.2003 for want of filing a written statement. He filed a notice of moti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Specific Performance Suit — Ex-parte Decree Restored Due to Valid Service of Summons. Service by affixture at last known address under Order 5 Rule 20 CPC held valid despite bailiff's report of 'left premises'.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance against the respondent/defendant based on an agreement dated 4th April 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Preliminary Decree Under Specific Relief Act — Preliminary Decree for Specific Performance Is Executable Without Separate Final Decree Proceedings

The petitioner, claiming to be Opponent No.4 in Regular Darkhast No.25/2009 pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pathardi, filed a Civil R...