Search Results for "essential medicines"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "essential medicines"

154 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 154 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Recognition of L.C.E.H. Qualification for Allopathic Practice. L.C.E.H. is a Homoeopathy Qualification and Does Not Entitle Holders to Practice Modern Scientific System of Medicine.

15 Apr 2013

The petitioners, LCEH Doctors' Association and two individual doctors holding L.C.E.H. (Licentiate of Court of Examiners in Homoeopathy) qualification...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case for Pharmaceutical Freebies. Expenses on Gifting Freebies to Medical Practitioners Are Deductible Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as Indian Medical Council Regulations Only Prohibit Acceptance, Not Gifting, Under Explanation 1.

22 Feb 2022

The dispute involved a pharmaceutical company, referred to as Apex, appealing against a High Court judgment that upheld orders disallowing part of its...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging NPPA's Interpretation of DPCO 2013 — Price Ceiling Applicable Only to Formulations in First Schedule. The court held that NPPA cannot impose price ceiling on non-scheduled formulations under DPCO 2013, as the order's language is clear and unambiguous.

10 Apr 2026

The petitioners, M/s. Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and the Indian Drug Manufacturers Association (IDMA), challenged the interpretation and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Communication Restricting Anaesthesiologists from Administering Anaesthesia in Dental Procedures. MD Anaesthesiologists are qualified to administer anaesthesia for dental surgeries under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and the Dentists Act, 1948.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioners, including the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists, Mangaluru Branch, the Nursing Home and Hospital Management Association, and Dr. G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal Against Denial of Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Passing Off Dispute, Holding No Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. Phonetic Similarity of 'CHYMTRAL FORTE' to 'CHYMORAL FORTE' Insufficient for Interim Relief Where Drugs are Schedule H Prescription Medicines and Public Interest Favors Affordable Pricing.

17 Nov 2017

The dispute arose from Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited's claim that Wockhardt Limited and East African (India) Remedies Pvt. Ltd. were passing off the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

21 Jan 2014

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Vacation of Interim Injunction in 'RACIRAFT' vs 'ESIRAFT' Trademark Case. The Court Examines Whether the Impugned Mark 'ESIRAFT' is Deceptively Similar to the Registered Mark 'RACIRAFT' for Pharmaceutical Products, Applying the Anti-Dissection Rule and Principles of Phonetic and Visual Similarity.

8 Apr 2026

The case involved a commercial appeal filed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. against an order of the Single Judge vacating an ad-interim injuncti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case Involving Pharmaceutical Marks LOX and XYLOX. Court finds prima facie that Defendants' XYLOX marks are deceptively similar to Plaintiff's LOX family of marks, and that the defence of common origin or acquiescence is not made out.

16 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Neon Laboratories Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Themis Medicare Ltd. (Defendant No. 1) and Ciro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Enforceable, Issues Directions on Minimum Turnover Clauses. The Court ruled that the Procurement Order 2012 has force of law and that minimum turnover clauses must be proportionate, directing effective implementation of the 25% procurement mandate.

25 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a Micro Enterprise and its founder, challenged the legality of minimum turnover clauses in government tenders that prevented their par...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)