Search Results for "equipment payment"

380 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Confiscation Order for Used Haemodialysis Machines — Import Not Prohibited Under Hazardous Waste Rules. Used Medical Equipment Not Classifiable as 'Hazardous Waste' or 'Waste' Under Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-Boundary Movement) Rules, 2016.

The petitioner, Hemant Surgical Industries Limited, is engaged in importing, manufacturing, and supplying medical equipment. Since 2008, it has import...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Service Tax Demand on Payment Aggregator Services for FY 2015-16. Services Provided by FIS Payment Solutions to Acquiring Banks for Settlement of Card Transactions Held Not Taxable as 'Business Auxiliary Service' Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, FIS Payment Solutions and Services India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, provides payment aggre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Work Order in Public Tender Dispute Due to Arbitrary Evaluation and Non-Compliance with Tender Conditions. Court holds that the respondent authority's failure to adhere to the stipulated tender conditions and its arbitrary evaluation of bids vitiates the award of the work order.

The petitioner, M/s. Hitech Audio Systems Pvt. Ltd., challenged a work order issued by the 2nd respondent, the Chief Engineer (Electrical) of the Publ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Wheeling and Transmission Charges Not Rent Under Section 194I. Payments for Use of Transmission Lines Held Not Rent as No Transfer of Possession or Right to Use Occurs.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that whee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Royalty and Advance Tax Case — Payments for Equipment and Spare Parts Not Taxable as Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. No Advance Tax Liability When Entire Income Subject to TDS.

The Revenue filed five appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumb...