Search Results for "eligible occupants"

208 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 208 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Unauthorized Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Encroachers Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Approval Granted to Cooperative Society of Municipal Tenants.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Pramod Vithal Salgaonkar, the Chief Promoter of Shree Dattaguru CHS (Prop), and another petitioner, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Appeal in Eviction and Regularization Case Over Stall Allotment. The dispute involved interpretation of license deed terms and applicability of regularization policies post-transfer of market management to the Council under a government notification.

The dispute arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the New Delhi Municipal Council against an occupant of a stall at Baba Kharag Singh Marg, New...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Under DCR 33(10) — Scheme Substantially Implemented, No Interference Warranted. Petitioners Failed to Establish Locus Standi or Eligibility, and the Scheme Had Progressed to Construction Stage.

The case involves a writ petition filed by twenty-one persons claiming to be occupants of a slum known as Meer Hussain Tangewala Chawl on land owned b...