Search Results for "electricity rebate"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "electricity rebate"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Industrial Incentive Dispute — Concessional Electricity Rate Not Available to Existing Enterprises Undergoing Substantial Expansion Under Himachal Pradesh Industrial Policy, 2019. The Court held that Clause 16(a) of the Industrial Policy applies only to new enterprises, and the doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot be invoked to compel the State to provide incentives without an enabling notification.

25 May 2026

The State of Himachal Pradesh and its departments appealed against the High Court's judgment that directed them to provide concessional electricity ra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds MERC Tariff Regulation Fixing Stringent Station Heat Rate for Dahanu TPS — No Discrimination Found. The Court held that the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission's differentiated norms for thermal generating stations based on past performance and efficiency are valid under the Electricity Act, 2003 and National Tariff Policy, 2006.

21 Jan 2019

The appellant, Reliance Infrastructure Limited, challenged the validity of Regulation 44.2(d) of the MERC (Multi Year Tariff) Regulations 2011, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Disconnection of Sick Industrial Company. Government's Communication to MSEDCL to Disconnect Supply Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice and Contrary to BIFR Directions.

18 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Goradia Special Steels Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956, is a sick industrial company registered with the Boa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff.

31 Aug 2020

The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Raj...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

13 Mar 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

High Court

High Court Allows Revision in KVAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Assessee Entitled to Compute ITC on Books of Account and Claim Rebate for Research Division Purchases. The court held that the assessee could compute input tax credit based on books of account under Sections 11, 14, 17 of KVAT Act and was entitled to rebate for purchases by its ancillary research division.

26 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Arbitration Petition Challenging Award in Advertising Rights Tender Dispute. Court Examines Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Dec 2025

The arbitration petition arose from a tender floated by Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) on 9 November 2018 for allotment...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Electricity Tariff Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to four Civil Review Applications (Nos. 23, 24, 25 and 26 of 2011) filed by industrial consumers against the State of Goa and th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Force Majeure Benefit Under Quota Policy — Power Cut Constitutes Force Majeure. The court held that a power cut imposed by the Gujarat Electricity Board is beyond the control of the exporter and qualifies as force majeure under clause 9 of the Government Entitlement Policy, 1994-1996, entitling the petitioners to extension of time for fulfilling export obligations.

21 Sep 2011

The petitioners, Esjay International Pvt. Ltd. and its director Sunil G. Jhangiani, are exporters recognized by the Government of India since 1981. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)