Search Results for "electricity bill dispute"

255 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 255 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition by Distribution Company Challenging Appellate Authority's Order Quashing Supplementary Bill for Unauthorized Use of Electricity. Extension of Supply to Adjacent Plots Without Permission Constitutes Unauthorized Use Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, filed a petition under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 226, and 227 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Electricity Board's Appeals in Illegal Disconnection Case — Board Cannot Claim Charges for Period of Its Own Wrongful Act. Initial Disconnection Without Considering Consumer's Instalment Request Violates Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Bihar State Electricity Board (appellant) and M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. (respondent/company) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Theft of Energy Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Tampering or Unauthorized Use Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 39 and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Girish Shankarlal Ostawal and Dilip Shankarlal Ostawal by the Judicial Magistrate First Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Board Against Decree Declaring Demand Letter Illegal. Court Holds That Dispute Regarding Meter Accuracy Must Be Referred to Electrical Inspector Under Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, and Civil Suit Is Not Maintainable.

The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (Board) appealed against a decree passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan, which declared a demand ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Orders — Lack of Proper Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside due to failure to provide adequate opportunity to the consumer.

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed by the Superin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Electricity Bill Disconnection for Non-Payment. Held that the Electricity Ombudsman's order directing payment of arrears before reconnection was valid and within jurisdiction under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Mr. Awadesh S. Pandey, a proprietor of Sunshine Plastic Industries, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombu...