Search Results for "electorate"

88 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MPLADS Circular Allowing Funds for Private Hospitals in COVID-19 Relief. Circular dated April 8, 2020, permitting MPLADS funds for private hospitals is intra vires the MPLAD Scheme and not arbitrary.

The petitioner, a legal practitioner, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging a circular dated April 8, 2020, issued by the Joint Secretary (MP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Voting Rights for APMC Representatives in Legislative Council Elections. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Not a Local Authority Under Article 171 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Radhakishan Deorao Pathade, Chairman of the Super Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Aurangabad, filed a writ petition seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Bar Council Elections and Advocate General's Ex-Officio Membership. Court upholds Advocate General's membership in Bar Council under Section 55 of Advocates Act, 1961 and dismisses allegations of electoral irregularities.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the composition and election of the Bar Council of Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Election Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, a Non-Member of the Federation and Its Member Societies, Cannot Challenge Election of Directors Under Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001.

The petitioner, Madhav Atmaram Sahakari, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No Substantial Question of Law Found Under Section 100 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The case involves two second appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a suit for declaration of title and pe...