High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition of APMC President Seeking to Attend State Marketing Board Meetings After Term Expiry. The court held that the petitioner ceased to be a member of the Board upon expiration of his 20-month term as President, and no provision allows a past President to continue as a Board member.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shiva Kumar S/o Siddanagowda Patil, was elected as a member of the Mundargi Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) on 11.5.2011 and subsequently elected as its President for a term of 20 months, which expired on 10.1.2013. Under the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966, the Karnataka State Agricultural Marketing Board is constituted at the State level, consisting of members elected from amongst the Chairmen of APMCs in each revenue district. The petitioner was elected as a member of the Board. However, after his term as President ended, the respondents (the Board and the State) prevented him from attending Board meetings. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to permit him to attend the meeting scheduled on 03.07.2013 and all future meetings. The court examined the scheme of the Act and found that the petitioner's membership in the Board was directly linked to his position as Chairman of the APMC. Since his term as President had expired, he ceased to be a member of the Board. The court held that there was no provision allowing a past President to continue as a Board member. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Agricultural Marketing - Membership of State Marketing Board - Term of Office - Section 3 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 - The petitioner was elected as President of APMC, Mundargi for a term of 20 months which expired on 10.1.2013. He was also elected as a member of the Karnataka State Agricultural Marketing Board. The court held that the petitioner's membership in the Board was co-terminus with his term as Chairman of the APMC. Upon expiry of his term as President, he ceased to be a member of the Board and had no right to attend Board meetings. The petition was dismissed. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, whose term as President of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee had expired, could continue to be a member of the Karnataka State Agricultural Marketing Board and attend its meetings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner is not entitled to attend meetings of the Karnataka State Agricultural Marketing Board after the expiry of his term as President of APMC, Mundargi.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Section 3 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act
  • 1966
  • Term of office of President of APMC
  • Cessation of membership in State Marketing Board upon expiry of term as Chairman
  • No right to attend Board meetings after term expires
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (12) 27

Writ Petition No. 27851 of 2013 (APMC)

2014-12-09

Justice Anand Byrareddy

Sri. F.V. Patil for Petitioner, Sri. A.C. Balaraj and Sri. C.V. Angadi for Respondents 1 and 2, Smt. K. Vidyavathi for Respondent 3

Shiva Kumar S/o Siddanagowda Patil

Karnataka State Agricultural Marketing Board, The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to permit petitioner to attend meetings of the Karnataka State Agricultural Marketing Board.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents 1 and 2 to permit the petitioner to attend the meeting to be held on 03.07.2013 and all future meetings of the Board.

Filing Reason

The petitioner, whose term as President of APMC, Mundargi had expired, was prevented from attending Board meetings.

Issues

Whether the petitioner, after expiry of his term as President of APMC, continues to be a member of the Karnataka State Agricultural Marketing Board and entitled to attend its meetings.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he was elected as a member of the Board and should be allowed to attend meetings. Respondents contended that the petitioner's membership in the Board ceased with the expiry of his term as President.

Ratio Decidendi

The membership of the Karnataka State Agricultural Marketing Board for a Chairman of an APMC is co-terminus with his term as Chairman. Upon expiry of the term as President, the person ceases to be a member of the Board and has no right to attend its meetings.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner, who was elected as the Chairman of the APMC, Mundargi, was also elected as a member of the Board. However, the term of the President is 20 months and the same had come to an end on 10.1.2013. The petitioner's membership in the Board is co-terminus with his term as Chairman of the APMC. Therefore, the petitioner ceased to be a member of the Board upon expiry of his term as President.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition on an unspecified date. The petition was heard on 02.12.2014 and the order was pronounced on 09.12.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966: Section 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition of APMC President Seeking to Attend State Marketing Board Meetings After Term Expiry. The court held that the petitioner ceased to be a member of the Board upon expiration of his 20-month term as President, ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Caste Certificate — Limited Scope of Inquiry Under Section 4(1) of Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act. Prima Facie Evidence Sufficient for Issuance of Scheduled Tribe Certificate; Appellate Authority Cannot...