Search Results for "ecclesiastical tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "ecclesiastical tribunal"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellant's Title and Possession Over Land Not Extinguished by Acquisition Proceedings. The court held that the appellant had locus standi to challenge the acquisition and that the delay was not fatal as possession continued.

14 Jul 2026

The appellant, Sri V Sreenivasaiah, filed a writ appeal against the order dated 25.02.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 2228/2022, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Exceeds Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Tahsildar Cannot Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, as Such Power Lies Only with Revenue Tribunal or Civil Court.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Tahsildar, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Held That Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy Act After 65 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950 attains finality and cannot be cancelled by the Tahsildar after such a long lapse of time, and the order was passed in violation of natural justice.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of original tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Ta...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Rent Control Matter — First Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 43 Rule 1(u) CPC by Remanding Suit Without Framing Substantial Question of Law. The High Court held that the First Appellate Court cannot reverse a trial court decree and remand the suit without framing a substantial question of law as mandated by Section 43 Rule 1(u) CPC.

17 Jun 2025

The appellant, Mustaf s/o Goususab Halagali @ Holageri, was the defendant in O.S.No.142/2014 filed by the respondent, Gangadhar s/o Channamallappa Jad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Probate Petition for Will of Ajay Harpal Singh, Dismisses Caveat by Widow on Grounds of Lack of Bona Fide Interest and Abuse of Process. The court held that a caveat filed without a caveatable interest and with intent to delay proceedings is liable to be rejected under Section 283 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

7 Aug 2023

The case involves a probate petition filed by Dr. Harpal Singh, the father of the deceased Ajay Harpal Singh, seeking grant of probate of the last Wil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Section 14 Order and Possession Notices Due to Lack of Proper Service and Violation of Natural Justice. The court set aside the order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and subsequent possession notices as they were passed without notice to the petitioner, who was not a borrower or guarantor.

22 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Satishkumar Surendra Shetty, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 9 February 2017 passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Disqualify Panchayat Member for Having More Than Two Children Under Section 14(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. The Court held that the disqualification provision applies to any person having more than two children, regardless of whether the children are from the same spouse or different relationships, and that the Collector's order rejecting the disqualification application was perverse and unsustainable.

23 Mar 2022

The Petitioner, Shri Tanaji Jagannath Palave, an elected Member of Panchayat Samiti from Ward No.5 of Village Panchayat Mandave, filed a writ petition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court's Refusal to Allow Additional Documents in Eviction Suit — No Error in Exercise of Discretion Under Order 13 Rule 1 CPC.

25 Jul 2019

The petitioners, as plaintiffs in a suit for eviction, sued two defendants. The second defendant, during his cross-examination, applied to produce cer...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Double Jeopardy Not Attracted as Earlier Award Was Not Satisfied. The court held that the filing of a second claim petition for the same accident is not barred by res judicata when the earlier award was not satisfied by the insurance company.

12 Mar 2018

The appeal was filed by the insurance company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 29.10.2013 pa...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)