Search Results for "drawee bank jurisdiction"

87 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Failure to Prove Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Leads to Quashing of Complaint.

The applicants, Chetan Sunderji Bhanushali, Pravin Girish Chamaria, and Ashapura Edifice Pvt. Ltd., filed two criminal applications under Section 482 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Service of notice by speed post or courier must be proved by cogent evidence; mere dispatch is insufficient.

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of petitions and applications under Section 482 CrPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Cheque Dishonour Cases for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Magistrate at Mumbai had no jurisdiction as no part of cause of action arose within its territorial limits under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The Bombay High Court considered a group of applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of process issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Restores Process in Cheque Dishonour Case. Jurisdiction for Section 138 NI Act lies where cheque is deposited for collection, not only where drawee bank is located.

The petitioner, Dr. Kiran Laxminarayan Maheshwari, a medical practitioner at Murbad, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Bank's Claim for Recovery of Dues from Export Company and its Director. Dispute Centers on Alleged Agreement to Debit Cash Credit Account Upon Dishonour of Foreign Bills Purchased Under FBP Facility.

The suit was filed by Bank of India to recover Rs.5,67,332.51 with interest at 19.5% per annum from B.C. Mody Exports P. Ltd. (defendant no.1) and its...