Search Results for "distributor"

206 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Complainant in Cheque Dishonour Cases, Convicts Accused. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused who stopped payment without valid cause, and dispute with third party not a defence.

The case involves three parties: Hewlett Packard (HP), Kores (India) Ltd. (complainant/appellant), and M/s Ambitious Marketing (accused/respondent). K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses LPG Distributor's Challenge Against Discontinuation of Home Delivery Charges Beyond Contract Territory. Principle of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Be Invoked Against Statutory Policy or When No Representation Was Made by the Authority.

The petitioner, M/s Jay Gas Agency, a proprietorship firm represented by Sneha Vilas Kulkarni, was appointed as an LPG distributor by Hindustan Petrol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Not Served, Termination Order Set Aside Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Prashant S/o Gulabrao Kamble, was a LPG distributor of Indian Oil Corporation Limited. His distributorship was terminated by the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in LPG Distributorship Termination Dispute. Clause 29 of Distributorship Agreement Allowed Termination Without Assigning Reasons, and Arbitrator's Findings Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Prasad Gas Agency, was appointed as a distributor of LPG (Bharat Gas) by the respondent, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Service of notice under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 must be proved by actual delivery or proper postal endorsement; mere dispatch is insufficient.

The petitioner, Ananda Rao Kanthamaneni, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Co...