Search Results for "distinctive feature"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving Beer Brands 'Haywards 5000' and '50000'. The court held that the numeral '5000' is an essential feature of the plaintiff's mark and that the defendants' mark '50000' is deceptively similar, leading to likelihood of confusion.

The plaintiff, Skol Breweries Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, Fortune Alcobrew Pvt. Limited and Hindust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Defendant's Logo Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Logo. Well-known mark entitled to protection across classes under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Reliance Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking injunctive reliefs against the Defendant, Concord Enviro Systems Pvt. Ltd., alleging inf...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'HOTEL SPECIAL' vs 'SVT HOTEL SPECIAL' for Asafoetida. Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Addition of Prefix 'SVT'.

The appellant/defendant, S.V.T Products, challenged an interim injunction order passed by the XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S. No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'LIVE IN' Mark Found Deceptively Similar to 'LIVE-IN'. Phonetic and visual similarity between marks leads to injunction under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Federal Brands Ltd., filed a trademark infringement and passing off suit against Levi Strauss India Pvt. Ltd. seeking a temporary injun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Defendant in Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Use of Plaintiff's Embossed Bottles for Country Liquor Constitutes Infringement of Registered Mark 'TANGO PUNCH' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited, and the defendant, South Konkan Distilleries, both manufacture and sell country liquor. T...