Search Results for "discretionary orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "discretionary orders"

1958 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1958 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Certified Standing Orders Interpretation Case Regarding Retirement Age. Clause 17(7)(iii) of Certified Standing Orders Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 Held to Confer Discretionary Power on Employer to Continue Employees from 58 to 60 Years, Not Creating Employee Right to Extension.

2 Mar 2023

The Civil Appeal involved a narrow controversy regarding the interpretation of clause 17(7)(iii) of the Certified Standing Orders under the Industrial...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IPS Officer's Voluntary Retirement in VRS Rejection Case — Central Government's Rejection Based on Pending Disciplinary Proceedings Set Aside as State Government's Recommendation for Acceptance Was Not Considered Properly. The Court held that the Central Government must give reasons for differing from the State's recommendation and that mere contemplation of proceedings without charge sheet does not justify rejection under Rule 16(2A) of the All India Service (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, an Indian Police Service (IPS) officer of the 1997 batch (Maharashtra cadre), sought voluntary retirement from service (VRS) by a notic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Executability of Specific Performance Decree Despite Delay in Deposit of Balance Consideration. Non-Deposit Within Stipulated Time Does Not Automatically Render Decree Inexecutable; Judgment-Debtor Must Seek Rescission Under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

6 May 2026

The case involves a dispute over the execution of a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The appellant, Habban S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Civil Appeals in Public Employment Dispute Over Director-General Appointment. The Court upheld the High Court's compensation order, ruling that the writ petitioner's challenge was barred by delay and laches as he acquiesced to appointment terms and failed to raise objections promptly under CPRI Rules and equitable principles.

7 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from the appointment of the respondent as Director-General of the Central Power Research Institute (CPRI), an autonomous body under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Condition in Food Kit Supply RFP for Gauri Ganpati Festival — Condition Held Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Pre-qualification criterion requiring experience of providing 300 labourers in 70 government locations with Rs. 25 crore work order found to be irrational and tailored to exclude eligible bidders.

5 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenged a pre-qualification condition (PQ5) in a Request...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tenants' Appeal in Rent Control Case — Striking Out Defence Not Automatic Under Section 15(7) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Discretionary Power Must Be Exercised Judiciously; Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Justify Striking Out Defence.

24 Sep 2019

The case involves an appeal by tenants against the High Court of Delhi's order upholding the Rent Controller's decision to strike out their defence in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on MSMED Act to Larger Bench. Balancing statutory remedies with writ jurisdiction: Supreme Court deliberates over MSMED Act provisions and alternative remedies.

22 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India examines whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable against an order passed by the Micro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Indefinite Blacklisting Order for Misbranded Veterinary Medicine — Show Cause Notice Lacked Specific Warning of Blacklisting and Appellant Was Not the Direct Supplier. The Court held that an indefinite blacklisting order without proper notice and without the appellant being a direct supplier is void ab initio and cannot be sustained.

11 Dec 2020

The appellant, Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Limited, a licensed drug manufacturer, was blacklisted indefinitely by the State of Uttar Pradesh on 08.09.200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit Challenging Compromise Decree. Interpretation of Kachhi Properties Judgment Clarified: No Automatic Stay of Execution Proceedings Upon Filing of Suit for Declaration that Decree is Void.

8 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court heard two appeals from orders rejecting temporary injunction applications. The first appeal (AO 884/2010) challenged an order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in RERA Execution Case, Holding Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC Applicable. The court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order disallowing amendment to execution applications seeking construction by decree holders at promoter's cost.

24 Jun 2026

The case involves five second appeals filed by allottees (Rajan Chandiramani, Jagruti Parikh and Anr., Priyanka Waghela, Srichand Makhija, and Jayesh ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)