Search Results for "directly elected Sarpanch"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Case — State Government's Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Violates Section 39(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

The Petitioner, Mangal Mahadu Korde, was elected as Sarpanch of Wakalwadi Village Panchayat in 2021. Respondent No.5, a member of the Panchayat, lodge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch Under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Lack of Proper Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that removal without affording opportunity of hearing and without proper enquiry is unsustainable.

The petitioner, Shri Jagdish Mannalalji Sancheriya, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Anji (Mothi), District Wardha in March 2019 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Removal Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Minister Failed to Consider Petitioner's Submissions, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 39(3) of the Act.

The petitioner, Vilas Bhagwat Jagtap, was elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Mudegaon in October 2017. Due to political rivalry, respondent no. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grampanchayat Resolution and Tahsildar's Order in Land Dispute. Court upholds validity of resolution and order, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

The petitioners, twelve residents of Sangav, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...