Search Results for "developer capacity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "developer capacity"

299 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 299 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

13 Jun 2005

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

7 Dec 2021

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Development Permission Despite Pending Criminal Case Against Different Property Developer. The court held that a criminal case concerning a different property cannot be a valid ground to refuse development permission for a separate land under a valid development agreement.

14 Nov 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Gurudaya Builders, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No. 3) to grant develo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Grant of Alewadi Port Project to Third Party Under Maharashtra Maritime Board Policies. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Treatment and Non-Consideration of Original Proposal Contrary to Port Policies.

13 Oct 2017

The dispute concerns the development of a multipurpose port at Alewadi in Maharashtra under the state's port policies. Petitioner, a UK-based private ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor of Cooperative Housing Society — Additional FSI Rights Not a Bar to Conveyance Under MOFA. The Court held that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction to entertain a second application for deemed conveyance after rejection of the first, and the developer's claim over additional FSI does not prevent conveyance of land to the society.

17 Jul 2026

The Petitioner, Ariisto Realtors Private Limited, a developer, challenged an order dated 14 July 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-oper...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation Over Sanction of Group Housing Project Permissions. Petition Challenges Conversion Sanad and Construction License Under Goa Town and Country Planning Laws.

27 Sep 2018

The case arose from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Betqui Candola Samvardhan Samitee, a society of villagers, challenging permissions granted t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in RERA Registration Dispute — Development Agreement Not Required to Be Registered Under Registration Act for Project Registration. The Court held that the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by insisting on compulsory registration of a development agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, as a precondition for processing a project registration application under Sections 3 and 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

18 Jul 2026

The appellant, Edcon Real Estate Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a Second Appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

8 Jul 2026

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to DCR 33(7) Surplus Area Surrender for Cessed Building Rehabilitation. Petitioners Contended Compulsory Acquisition Without Adequate Compensation.

7 May 2015

The group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenged the constitutional validity of clause 4 of Appendix III to Regulation 33(7) of the...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)