Search Results for "detenue statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "detenue statement"

137 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Service on Detenue in Judicial Custody and Reliance on Irrelevant Material. The court held that failure to serve detention order promptly and reliance on a case where detenue was not involved vitiates the subjective satisfaction under the MPDA Act.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dikshant @ Dadu Devidas Sapkale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Blanks in In-Camera Statements and Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) was violated as the in-camera statements contained blanks and the grounds of detention contained details not found in those statements.

30 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Sanjay s/o Ramuji Phatode, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act for Alleged Dangerous Activities. Non-Furnishing of Proforma FIR Not Fatal, but Discrepancy in Translated Grounds Found Factually Well Grounded.

3 Sep 2021

The petitioner, a detenue, challenged a preventive detention order dated 12.05.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur under Section 3(2) o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

24 Jul 2015

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Burhan Fakhruddin Khatumdi, challenged a detention order dated 27.3.2015 passed by the Principal Secretar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Service on Detenue in Judicial Custody and Reliance on Irrelevant Material. The court held that failure to serve detention order on detenue while in judicial custody and reliance on a criminal case in which detenue was not involved renders the order illegal.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dikshant @ Dadu Devidas Sapkale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Against Detenu in Custody Due to Lack of Recorded Satisfaction on Imminent Release. The Court Holds That Preventive Detention Under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 Requires Strict Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Article 22 of the Constitution.

24 Nov 2021

The petitioner, Sayed Noor Sayed Nasir, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the preventive detentio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 9 months and 21 days between arrest and detention order held to be fatal, vitiating the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA.

30 Jan 2013

The petitioner, wife of the detenu, filed a writ petition challenging the detention order dated 13.06.2012 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu Already in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application. Preventive detention held unjustified when there was no imminent possibility of release on bail, as the detenu had not applied for bail and was in judicial custody.

21 Jul 2010

The petitioner, father of the detenu Pritesh Dinesh Doshi, challenged the detention order dated 11/8/2009 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind to Witness Statements. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider in-camera statements, violating the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

14 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Ravi Hanumant Thorat, brother-in-law of the detenu Sahadeo @ Sada Laxman Dhavare, challenged the validity of a preventive detention or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents — Failure to Furnish In-Camera Statements and Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

31 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Hanuman Rajaram Mhatre, was detained under an order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sectio...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)