WRIT PETITION NO. 383 OF 2025
8 May 2025...
Search Results for "demolition complaint"
220 result(s) found
Found 220 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation or Proximate Link. Allegations of harassment for loan repayment do not constitute abetment under Section 306 IPC as there was no direct instigation or active role in driving the deceased to suicide.
11 Jan 2024The judgment pertains to a criminal writ petition and two criminal applications filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of ...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes FIRs in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of cheating, forgery, and criminal trespass found to be civil disputes without criminal ingredients under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 447, 427, 506(ii) read with 34 IPC.
29 Aug 2023The judgment concerns three connected criminal writ petitions arising from a land dispute in Salvador-Do-Mundo, Goa. The petitioners in WPCR 64/2021 a...
- 13
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition for Mandamus Against State and Panchayat for Failure to Enforce Stop Work Notice on Illegal Construction. Court Directs Demolition of Unauthorized Construction by Neighbour Without Permission and Setback, Holding Panchayat's Inaction Justifies Judicial Intervention.
31 Jul 2023The petitioner, Mr. Raphael Domnic Philip Patricio, co-owner of property bearing Survey No.87/3 in Village Nerul, filed a writ petition under Article ...
- 29
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Landlord's Appeal in Rent Control and Municipal Demolition Case, Upholding Tenant's Statutory Protection and Damages Award. The Court affirmed that statutory protection under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 overrides municipal demolition powers under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, and that the tenant's suit for damages was not barred under Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
14 Sep 2021The dispute originated from the demolition of a rented building by the Bangalore City Corporation, leading to litigation between the tenant and the la...
- 243
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Cessed Building Without Compliance with Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Court holds that prior permission of the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 is mandatory before demolition of a cessed building.
6 Sep 2019The petitioners, tenants of a cessed building known as 'Shreeji Krupa' in Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of the building by ...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Cessed Building Without Compliance with Section 354 of MMC Act and DCR 33(7) — Held that Municipal Corporation must follow statutory procedure before demolition of dilapidated buildings.
19 Aug 2019The petitioners, tenants residing in a cessed building known as Martand Prasad Building in Malad (West), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Part Occupation Certificate for Building Height Violation. Flat Purchasers Cannot Seek Revocation of Occupation Certificate as They Have Alternative Remedy Under RERA and No Vested Right to Challenge Planning Permissions.
16 Oct 2018The petitioners, Sanjay Phulwaria and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challe...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs BMC to Provide Alternate Premises to Disabled Petitioner After Illegal Demolition of Stall. License Under Section 394 of MMC Act, 1888 Does Not Authorize Structure on Public Land, but Demolition Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.
17 Sep 2018The petitioner, Mohd. Sayed Mohd. Salim Nagori Rizvi, a person with 100% hearing disability, filed a writ petition seeking reconstruction of his stall...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.
16 Sep 2005The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...
- 102
