Search Results for "dealer exception"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "dealer exception"

173 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Assessment Order and Trade Circular as Ultra Vires Section 6A of CST Act. Inter-State Job Work Movement Not Deemed Sale Under Section 6A Because It Does Not Cover Principal-to-Principal Transactions.

16 Feb 2016

The petitioner, a manufacturer and job worker, received spent catalyst from customers within and outside Maharashtra, processed it, and returned the r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging LPG Distributorship Award Due to Ineligibility Under Relationship Criteria. Petitioner's father-in-law held existing dealership, violating clause 5(b) of eligibility criteria.

29 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Sau. Anjani Sanjay Mane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the award of an LPG distribu...

High Court

SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009

8 Feb 2019

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Assessment Orders Issued in Trade Name Despite Proprietor's Participation — Estoppel by Conduct Bars Challenge to Notice. The Court held that assessment orders are not non-est merely because notices were issued in the trade name, as the proprietor participated in proceedings without objection.

15 Mar 2016

The case involves multiple sales tax references filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax against M/s. Klip Nail Care and other respondents. The common q...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Rebuttal of Presumption Under Section 139 Requires Evidence, Not Mere Denial. The court held that the accused failed to rebut the presumption that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt, and the complainant proved the debt arising from sale of agricultural implements on credit.

8 Feb 2010

The appellant, M/s Sai Auto Agencies, a dealer in tractors and agricultural equipment, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrumen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Holds that Taking Insurance Policy for Commercial Premises is for Commercial Purpose, Excluding Complainant from Definition of 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court ruled that a commercial entity taking fire insurance policy for its business premises is not a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act, as the policy is taken for commercial purpose.

13 Apr 2023

The present appeals by special leave assail the judgment and order dated 3rd December, 2004 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Na...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court Judgment Dismissing Challenge to Arbitral Award in Bill Discounting Dispute — Contractual Interest Rate of 36% Per Annum with Monthly Rests Upheld. High Court's Upholding of Arbitral Award on Interest Rate Based on Mutual Agreement Between Commercial Parties and Not Opposed to Public Policy.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a bill discounting facility extended by the respondent to a seller (BDDL) and buyer (appellant) of goods. The appellant and BDD...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice

1 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Poly Packs of Chewing Tobacco Held as Group Packages Intended for Retail Sale Under Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that poly packs containing multiple pouches with MRP printed are group packages under Rule 2(g) of Standards of Weights & Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977, and not exempt under Rule 34(b) as net weight exceeds 10 gms.

8 Jul 2024

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal which had set aside the Commissioner's order confirming a ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)