Search Results for "dangerous activities"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Consideration of Bail Conditions and In-Camera Statements Not Affecting Public Order. The court held that failure to consider bail conditions and lack of public order disturbance in in-camera statements renders the detention order invalid under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

4 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Paras Rajendra Apte, challenged his detention order dated 09.04.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Yavatmal under Section 3(2) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Against Bootlegger Under MPDA Act — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Inadequate Verification of Witness Statements Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority did not consider bail orders and verification of anonymous witnesses was flawed, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

8 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Dhanubai @ Dhanno Yashvant Netlekar, challenged an order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon, detaining her as...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Criminal Antecedents Without Evidence of Public Order Disturbance.

8 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Ashok Kisan Jadhav, challenged his detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.

15 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat — Single Crime and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Sustain Detention as 'Dangerous Person'.

15 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Vicky Satyawan Chavan @ Barkya, challenged a preventive detention order dated 08/07/2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detaining Authority Relied on Extraneous Material Including Inapplicable Sections. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated by Reliance on Irrelevant Documents Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

29 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Pawan Tukaram Kudale, challenged a detention order dated 29 January 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. The court held that mere criminal antecedents without evidence of public disturbance do not justify preventive detention under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

20 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Nikki @ Kawa s/o Suresh Khare, challenged an order of detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City on 29 January 2018 u...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenu — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. The court held that failure to supply grounds in Telugu, the only language known to the detenu, vitiated the detention order and ordered his release.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Jayamma, wife of the detenu Giddappa @ Lambu Giddappa, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Independently Consider Grounds, Leading to Mechanical Affirmation of Proposal.

25 Jun 2012

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Janardan @ Janyadada Chintaman Bhoir, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order date...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)