Search Results for "customs tariff classification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "customs tariff classification"

126 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

1 May 2020

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order Classifying Motor-home Under CTH 87.02. Settlement Commission Has Jurisdiction to Interpret Tariff Classification Under Customs Act, 1962.

8 Jul 2022

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28.07.2008 passed by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission, Additio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Commissioner of Customs' Appeal Against Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Anti-Dumping Duty Demand. Tribunal Correctly Found Show Cause Notices Lacked Basis for Reclassification and Anti-Dumping Notification Did Not Cover Goods Under Declared Tariff Heading CTH 40021100 Under Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

21 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Pune against a judgment of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Importer's Appeal in Customs Tariff Classification of Laser Imagers — Laser Imagers Held to be Accessories Classifiable Under CTH 9033. Laser Imager Lacking Independent Diagnostic Capability and Compatible with Machines Under Multiple Tariff Headings Falls Under Residuary CTH 9033 00 00, Not CTH 9018 90 19, Under Note 2 to Chapter 90 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute concerned the correct tariff classification of imported 'Dryview 6850 Laser Imagers W/3D' under the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification Disputes — Cenvat Credit and Valuation Issues Decided. Classification of goods under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and eligibility for Cenvat Credit under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 determined based on functional use and technical literature.

30 Jul 2014

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification Disputes — Laminated Tubes and Printed Cartons Classified as Printed Matter Under Chapter 49. The court held that no substantial question of law arose as the classification was a question of fact determined by the Tribunal based on evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed multiple appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the common order of the Cus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Without Pre-deposit in Classification Dispute — Tribunal's Discretion Must Be Exercised Consistently. Pre-deposit direction set aside as Tribunal failed to follow its own earlier order on identical issue under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962.

25 Nov 2010

The appellant, Videocon Industries Ltd., a manufacturer of LCD TVs, had been regularly importing Liquid Crystal Device – Thin Film Transistor Module...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Challenging Customs Broker's Penalty Under Section 114AA, Questions Jurisdiction Over MEIS Classification. Three substantial questions of law framed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1944 regarding the authority of customs to penalise for MEIS scrip classification and applicability of Section 28/28AAA.

15 Apr 2026

The matter concerned an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1944 before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, filed by a licensed Custo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Steel Products Classified as 'Angles, Shapes and Sections' Under Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court holds that MRP-based valuation applies only when product is covered by Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and rules thereunder.

27 Sep 2013

The judgment involves three writ appeals filed by M/s Meenakshi Steel Re-rolling Mills and M/s Bhuwalka Steel Industries Limited against the Union of ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)