Search Results for "cross examination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "cross examination"

9511 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9511 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Common Cross-Examination in Eviction Suits to Prevent Prejudice to Tenants. Trial Court's Order Dismissing Application for Common Cross-Examination Set Aside Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

29 Aug 2019

The petitioners, tenants in four eviction suits filed by the respondent landlord society, sought common cross-examination of the society's sole witnes...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice

1 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deferment of Cross-Examination in Sessions Case for Lack of Reasons Under Section 231(2) CrPC. Court holds that discretion to defer cross-examination must be exercised with reasons and not arbitrarily.

6 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Pradip Kundlikrao Kute, challenged an order dated 01.04.2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar in Sessions Case No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSFC's Petition Challenging DRAT Order Granting Cross-Examination in Loan Recovery Case. Right to Cross-Examine Affidavit Deponent Is a Valuable Right Not Barred by Rule 12(6) of DRT Procedure Rules.

2 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation (MSFC), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challeng...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Accused's Petition for Cross-Examination in NI Act Case — Rejection of Section 145(2) Application Set Aside. The Court held that once the accused discloses specific defence in an application under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the Magistrate must allow the application and grant an opportunity for cross-examination.

26 Feb 2024

The Petitioner, Narayan Shivdas Kadam, was an accused in a complaint filed by M/S Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. under Section 138 of the Negotiab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination in Sessions Case — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Cross-Examine PW1 Despite Delay. The court set aside the trial court's order rejecting recall of witness under Section 311 CrPC, holding that fair trial requires opportunity to cross-examine, subject to costs.

31 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Murlidhar Kapile, original accused no.3 in Sessions Case No. 35/2012, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Legal Question on Production of Documents for Cross-Examination of Party Under CPC. The Court Interprets Order XIII Rule 1(3)(a) and Whether a Party is a 'Witness' for Purposes of Confronting with Documents Not Filed Earlier.

15 Sep 2017

This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenged an order dated 28 September 2016 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Divisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Cross-Examine Autopsy Surgeon on Treatment Papers in Murder Trial — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Cross-Examination on Documents Not Formally Proved. The court held that the right of cross-examination is a valuable right and cannot be curtailed by a narrow interpretation of Section 294 CrPC, and the accused must be allowed to challenge the doctor's opinion on the basis of treatment papers produced by him.

13 Jan 2020

The petitioners, original accused in Sessions Case No. 153 of 2015 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, are charged under Section...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Complainant to Lead Further Evidence After Accused's Evidence in Private Complaint Proceedings — Section 246 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Re-examination. The court held that the Magistrate has discretion to permit the complainant to lead further evidence after the accused's evidence in a private complaint case, setting aside the order rejecting such application.

13 Jul 2018

The respondent (complainant) filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. alleging that the petitioner (accused No.1) married another woman (ac...

High Court

High Court Allows Criminal Petition, Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Deferment of Cross-Examination Under Section 231(2) Cr.P.C. -- Accused in IPC Offences Including Section 302 Granted Relief to Prevent Prejudice in Defence Disclosure

3 Feb 2026

The petitioners, accused in a sessions case involving grave offences under the IPC, sought deferment of cross-examination of witnesses under Section 2...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)