Search Results for "creditors meeting dispensed"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Shareholder's Allegations of Fraud Do Not Override Statutory Bar When Secured Assets Are Involved.

The petitioner, Shashikant Gangar, a shareholder and director of Libox Chem (India) Private Limited (respondent no. 2), filed a writ petition challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Twelve Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court found compliance with statutory requirements and no objections from authorities, shareholders, or creditors.

This judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction filed by Santorini Realty Private Limited, the twelfth transferor company, seeking sanction of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court dispenses with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to written consent and no objections from authorities.

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction No. 340 of 2014 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under the Companies Act, 1956. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Transferor Companies with Transferee Company under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956. Court found scheme fair and reasonable, no objections from Regional Director or Official Liquidator, and no prejudice to shareholders or creditors.

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction No. 337 of 2014 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under the Companies Act, 1956. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court found compliance with statutory requirements and no objections from stakeholders, thus approving the amalgamation.

The Bombay High Court considered a Company Summons for Direction filed by Advantage Raheja Developers Private Limited, one of the Transferor Companies...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Fifteen Transferor Companies with Transferee Company under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956. Court found scheme fair and reasonable, no objections received, and ordered dissolution of transferor companies without winding up.

This is a company summons for direction filed by D.B.R Properties Private Limited, the fifteenth transferor company, seeking sanction of a scheme of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Thirteen Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from shareholders or creditors.

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a scheme of amal...