Search Results for "counsel unavailability"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Justice Upheld: Supreme Court Convicts Four in Coordinated Fatal Assault" The judgment reaffirms that minor discrepancies in evidence cannot overshadow substantive guilt.

The Supreme Court of India affirmed the conviction of four appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, overturning the trial court's...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Cancellation of Allotment for Non-Construction of School Building Within Stipulated Period. Conditional Sale Deed Rescinded Due to Failure to Fulfill Condition Precedent of Construction Within 5 Years.

The appellant, M/S Divyajyothi Vidya Kendra, a society registered under the Karnataka Society Registration Act, 1960, was allotted a civic amenity sit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's SLP as Time-Barred Due to 663-Day Delay, Imposes Costs for Wasting Judicial Time. Government Inefficiency Not a Valid Ground for Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh as time-barred due to an inordinate delay of 663 days. The C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Director's Evidence in Specific Performance Suit — Order 18 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Apply to Company Director. Director of Plaintiff-Company Can Be Examined After Constituted Attorney Without Prior Permission Under Order 18 Rule 3A CPC.

The petitioners, defendants in a suit for specific performance of a contract based on email exchanges, challenged the trial court's order allowing the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBEC Circular on Service Tax Refund for Exporters — Circular Held Ultra Vires Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 93 of Finance Act, 1994.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies including Larsen & Toubro Limited, Uhde India Private Limited, Tata Tel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order in Company Law Dispute Over Share Transfer and Oppression. Court upholds CLB's refusal to dismiss petition under Section 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956, finding prima facie case of oppression and mismanagement.

The judgment arises from a company appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, by M/s. Gharda Chemicals Limited and others against an o...