Search Results for "copyright"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "copyright"

149 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Evidence of Prior Use and Reputation. Oral Agreement Claim Fails as Plaintiffs Cannot Establish Exclusive Rights Over 'Puranmal' Mark and Chef Logo.

27 Jul 2016

The plaintiffs, Abhay Agarwal, Ajay Agarwal, and Puranmal Restaurant, a partnership firm based in Dubai, filed a suit against Puranmal Goods Private L...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that failure to send notice to the correct address of the drawer within the prescribed period renders the complaint not maintainable and amounts to abuse of process.

9 Oct 2020

The case involves two criminal petitions filed by the petitioners (accused) under Sections 428 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction Applications in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suits — No Prima Facie Case for Confusion Between 'Manugraph' and 'Simarq' or 'Ezeego' and 'La Travenues'. The court held that the marks are not deceptively similar and the goods/services are different, thus no interim relief is warranted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

15 Jun 2016

The judgment involves two suits for trademark infringement and passing off. In Suit No. 516 of 2013, the plaintiff Manugraph India Limited sought to r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, but Alternative Relief of Damages Granted. Court holds that failure to prove agreement does not bar claim for earnest money refund under Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

19 Jul 2017

The appellant, an architect, filed three suits for specific performance of agreements to sell immovable property against Gustavo Pinto and Lucio Miran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Copyright Dispute Over Film Pakeezah Songs — Assignment of Musical Rights Held Valid and Exclusive. The petitioner, as assignee of sole and exclusive musical recording rights under an agreement dated 13th February 1971, was entitled to exploit the rights without interference from the original plaintiff.

22 Sep 2011

The petitioner, Saregama India Limited (formerly Gramophone Company of India Limited), filed a civil revision application challenging an order passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement and Passing Off Action Over Television Talent Show Format. Zee Entertainment's 'India's Best Dramebaaz' Concept Found Prima Facie Copied by Sony's 'Drama Company'.

5 Apr 2017

The plaintiff, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd, filed a quia timet copyright infringement and passing off action against Sony Pictures Networks Indi...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Appeal for Telugu Movie 'Roja' — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Ownership of Copyright. Assignment Agreement Not Proved as Witnesses Not Examined and No Evidence of Consideration Paid Under Section 19 of Copyright Act, 1957.

6 Mar 2026

The appellant, Lahari Recording Co. P. Ltd., filed two original side appeals against the common judgment and decree dated 05.01.2016 passed by a learn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Suit Against Film 'Baaghi' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Works. The court held that similarities were at the level of general ideas, not protectable expression under the Copyright Act, 1957.

21 Apr 2016

The Plaintiffs, XYZ Films LLC, PT Merantau Films, and Sikhya Entertainment Private Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against UTV Motion Pic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Plaintiff Owner of Copyright in Drawings Developed Under Contract for Valuable Consideration. Payment of Rs.2,87,500/- for Development of Drug Powder Inhaler Transfers Copyright Ownership Under Section 17 of Copyright Act, 1957.

24 Feb 2005

The plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, a pharmaceutical company, sought to develop a Drug Powder Inhaler (DPI) device for asthma medications...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Copyright Infringement Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Copying. The court held that mere similarity in compilation of questions does not constitute infringement under Sections 63 and 65 of Copyright Act, 1957, and no dishonest intention for cheating under Section 420 IPC was made out.

25 Sep 2018

The applicants (Maroti Kamlapure, Vitthal Bayas, and Chaya Shinde) filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)