KAHC010403282026_2
23 Jul 2026The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged the award of a rate contract for supply of Liquid Sodium Hypochlorite Solution 5% 5ltr (drug code 430) ...
Search Results for "consortium exclusion"
89 result(s) found
Found 89 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, hears a company petition for winding up of Videocon Industries Limited under sections 433(e) and 434(1)(a) read with 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petition, filed by an Italian bank, alleges non-payment of Euros 38 million under a Patronage Letter, which the petitioner argues is a guarantee for a loan to a step-down subsidiary.
5 Dec 2013The petition, Company Petition No. 528 of 2012, was filed by Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A., an Italian bank, seeking the winding up of Videocon Industries Li...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Borrower's Waiver Challenge and ARCL's Interest Inclusion Petitions in SARFAESI Appeal Pre-Deposit Dispute. The Court reduced pre-deposit from 50% to 25% of debt due including interest, balancing the borrower's right to appeal and the secured creditor's interests.
19 Dec 2024The case involves cross-petitions arising from a common DRAT order dated 04 June 2024. The borrower, M/s Royal Traders, challenged the DRAT's refusal ...
- 412
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.
15 Oct 2024The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...
- 666
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Declines to Interfere in Tender Award for Ash Handling Plant; Holds Scope of Judicial Review Limited and Finds No Arbitrariness in Awarding Contract to Lowest Bidder Consortium Despite Office Memorandum Barring Chinese Companies.
2 Nov 2022The writ petition was filed by Macawber Beekay Pvt. Ltd. challenging the notice inviting tender dated 24.06.2022 and the consequent letter of intent i...
- 65
High Court
Supreme Court Upholds Financial Creditor in Insolvency Petition Based on Balance Sheet Acknowledgement Under Limitation Act. The Court held that entries in signed balance sheets constitute acknowledgement of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, extending the limitation period for applications under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and that defects in the application regarding the date of default are curable.
15 Apr 2021The dispute arose from an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) filed by Asset Reconstruction Company (India) ...
- 198
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Tender Conditions in Centralized Printing of Registration Certificates and Driving Licenses. Petitioner Challenged Clauses 2.15 and 2.16 of Request for Proposal as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India for Being Arbitrary and Tailor-Made.
20 Sep 2022The matter involved a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain pre-qualification and technical evaluation conditions in a Reques...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.
4 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...
- 195
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Bank Guarantees in Tender Dispute. Earnest Money Deposit Forfeited as Bidder's Unilateral Discount Offer After Bid Opening Violated Tender Terms.
23 Dec 2010The petitioner, Knowledge Infrastructure Systems Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in coal trading, along with its shareholder, filed a writ petition under...
- 129
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Tender Dispute, Upholding Limited Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The Court Reiterated That Judicial Interference in Tender Awards is Restricted to Cases of Arbitrariness or Irrationality, and Courts Must Defer to the Tendering Authority's Interpretation of Contract Terms.
17 Sep 2021The Supreme Court of India addressed a civil appeal concerning the scope of judicial review in tender matters under Article 226 of the Constitution. T...
- 436
