Search Results for "concurrent prosecution"

732 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 732 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Concurrent Findings Case. Court declines to interfere with concurrent findings of fact based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence under Section 307 IPC.

The case involves three criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court dated 16.08.2010, which dismissed the appeals of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Passport Fraud Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Principle of Parity. Conviction under Section 420 IPC and Passports Act set aside as co-accused with similar role were acquitted and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, accused No.2, was convicted under Section 420 IPC read with Section 12(2) of the Passports Act, 1967 for allegedly facilitating the iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld as Complaint Did Not Disclose Prima Facie Case.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate, filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Prosecution Under Section 321 CrPC — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Trial and Revisional Courts. The Public Prosecutor's Application Based on Government Order Was Sufficient and Did Not Require Further Independent Satisfaction.

The applicants, original accused in C.R. No. 14/2003 registered at Police Station Bhokar, District Nanded, for offences under Sections 352, 353, 332, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Attempted Robbery and House Trespass — Evidence of Injured Complainant and Son Found Credible. Concurrent findings of fact under Sections 393 and 452 IPC upheld as not perverse.

The applicant, Chandu @ Chandrakant Ramkrishna Pawar, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.5, Amravati in Regular Criminal C...