Search Results for "concealment"

748 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 748 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Concealment of Facts Found. Tribunal's cancellation of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as assessee had disclosed all material facts and claimed deduction under Section 54F.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 21/03...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Gauchar Land Encroachment for Mining Activities Due to Lack of Bonafide Public Interest and Concealment of Facts. Petitioners failed to disclose pending civil suit and did not implead necessary parties, rendering the PIL an abuse of process.

The present petition was filed as a public interest litigation by two individuals claiming to be residents of Village Indore, Taluka Jhagadiya, Distri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Nullity of Marriage Under Section 11 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on Ground of Fraudulent Concealment of Religion. Marriage Between Parsi and Hindu Held Voidable as Consent Was Obtained by Suppressing Respondent's Religion.

The appellant-husband, a Parsi by religion, married the respondent-wife on 15th April 1999 according to Hindu vedic rites. They had a son on 4th Augus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Annulment of Marriage Due to Suppression of Incurable Skin Disease by Wife. Fraudulent Concealment of Material Facts Renders Marriage Voidable Under Section 12(1)(c) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant husband, Mayank Malhotra, filed two appeals under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging a common judgment dated 23.07.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment.

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...