Search Results for "commercial plot"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "commercial plot"

674 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 674 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Lease Forfeiture Case, Upholding UPSIDA's Cancellation Order. The forfeiture was justified due to breach of construction timelines under the lease agreement, and the High Court's refusal to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was correct as the dispute was contractual in nature.

6 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute over the forfeiture of an industrial plot lease by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows De-Sealing of Commercial Premises in PIL Based on Judicial Committee Order. Applicant's Premises Ordered to be De-Sealed Subject to Compliance with Common Order Dated 18.12.2023.

31 Oct 2025

The present application (I.A. No.203615 of 2024) was filed by an individual applicant seeking de-sealing of his commercial premises located at plot No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Cancellation of Highest Bid in Tender for Plot Lease Due to Arbitrariness and Non-Application of Mind. State Instrumentality's Decision Must Be Based on Relevant Considerations and Not Inconsistent Stands.

23 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court, in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, examined the challenge by a petitioner-firm against the deci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cooperative Society Plot Allotment Dispute Due to Lack of Maintainability and Unclean Hands. Dispute Raised by Non-Members and Rival Claimants Under Section 61 of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 Was Not Maintainable as It Did Not Touch Constitution, Management or Business of Society.

11 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute over allotment of a plot measuring 3.2 cents in a layout formed by the N.G.O. Cooperative Building Society Ltd. The Go...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of CIDCO's Lease Cancellation in Tender Dispute. The court held that CIDCO's cancellation was unjustified as the partnership firm's bid was initially accepted, changes were authorized, and no concrete breaches of tender terms were proven, applying principles of promissory estoppel and administrative fairness.

29 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a tender called by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO) on 11.06.2008 for lease of land near ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Seeks Resolution of Dispute Over Unauthorized Colony in Faridabad Through Arbitration and Committee Formation. The Court directs parties to submit responses on land extent, layout, and development charges to facilitate completion of the project.

3 Oct 2019

The present dispute pertains to the claim of allottees who were not allotted plots on land owned by respondent No.6-Colonizer, Durga Builders Pvt. Ltd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against CIDCO's Refusal to Grant NOC for Additional FSI for IT/ITES Development. Government Order dated 31st August 2009 enabling additional FSI for IT/ITES use is binding on CIDCO as a planning authority.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Shakti Commercial Premises Society Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Coop. Societies Act, 1960, filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices Issued by Nagpur Improvement Trust for Alleged Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that show cause notices under Section 53 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 must be served on the owner or person in possession, and that the Trust cannot demolish without giving an opportunity of hearing.

19 Mar 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by owners of flats in Nagpur challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

19 Dec 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Revaluation of Lease Premium and Ground Rent for Commercial Plots. The court upheld CIDCO's power to revise lease terms based on current market rates under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, rejecting claims of estoppel and legitimate expectation.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by commercial plot allottees in Navi Mumbai challenging the decision of the City and Industrial Devel...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)