Search Results for "causing death by negligence"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Alteration of Charges in Electricity Act and IPC Case. Court Holds That Alteration of Charge Under Section 216 Cr.P.C. Is Permissible Before Judgment and No Prejudice Caused to Accused.

The criminal revision petition was filed by the accused No.1, Sri Shivappa, challenging the order dated 11.07.2022 passed by the Court of I Additional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, and 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilty Mind Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Manasing Tukaram Lamani, was the accused in C.C. No. 208/2011 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalkot. He was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Conductor in Bus Accident Case Under Section 308 IPC — No Intent to Cause Death or Grievous Hurt Established. Ringing Bell Without Checking Passenger Boarding Does Not Amount to Attempt to Commit Culpable Homicide.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the conviction of Abdul Ansar, a bus conductor, under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Truck Driver Convicted for Rash and Negligent Driving Causing Death of a Minor. Concurrent findings of fact on identity of driver and rashness upheld; no interference warranted.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Subhash Chand, who was convicted under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Rash Driving Case: Sentences to Run Concurrently. The Court held that under Section 31 CrPC, it is mandatory to specify whether multiple sentences run concurrently or consecutively, and directed concurrent running of sentences under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

The appellant, Gagan Kumar, was prosecuted and convicted by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving...