Search Results for "bonafide prosecution"

335 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 335 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor Set Aside as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Other Witnesses.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under POCSO Act and IPC for alleged aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a 6-year-old girl. The vic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Exclusion of 1854 Days for Filing Challenge to MSME Award Due to Bona Fide Prosecution in Wrong Forum and COVID-19. Period from 5 April 2017 to 1 November 2022 excluded under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Bharat Electronics Limited, filed an Interim Application seeking exclusion of 1854 days from 5 April 2017 to 1 November 2022 for comput...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Rejecting Condonation of 856-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Against Decree on Admission. Petitioner's Withdrawal of Timely Appeal and Subsequent Delay Not Justified as Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order dated 9 November 2022 passed by the Debt R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Age of Victim Determined by Ossification Test and School Records, Consent Irrelevant for Minor.

The appellant, Sujoy @ Sanjay Laltu Chakravarty, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, in Special POCSO Case No. 11/2014 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Telgi Stamp Paper Scam. Multiple Accused Including Kingpin Abdul Karim Telgi Challenge Conviction Under IPC Sections 255-260, 120B.

The judgment text provided is incomplete and does not contain the final decision. This batch of criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 660/2009, 510/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Confirmation of Death Penalty and Appeals in Family Murders Case. Charges under Section 302 IPC for Killing Wife and Three Children Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The Confirmation Case No.3 of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No.518 of 2005 arose out of the conviction of the accused Ajitsingh Harnamsingh Gujral by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reconsiders Appellant’s Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence; Handwriting Expert Opinion Under Scrutiny. Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Challenged on Grounds That Chain of Circumstances Incomplete and Expert Evidence Not Corroborated.

The appellant, Vikas Ramdas Khairnar Patil, preferred a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against his conviction and life imprisonment for ...