Search Results for "bogus tenancies"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "bogus tenancies"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to DCR 33(7) Surplus Area Surrender for Cessed Building Rehabilitation. Petitioners Contended Compulsory Acquisition Without Adequate Compensation.

7 May 2015

The group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenged the constitutional validity of clause 4 of Appendix III to Regulation 33(7) of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

11 Dec 2006

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction on Municipal School Land — No Violation Found in Grant of IOD and Occupation Certificate. Court held that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the construction or deviation from sanctioned plans, and the PIL was dismissed with costs.

25 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Sanjay Krishna Chavan, claiming to be an RTI activist and social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Cou...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Sale Deed Validity — Restores Trial Court Decree Based on Benami Transaction and Adverse Possession Findings. The Court held that the sale deed executed by defendant no. 3 in favour of defendant no. 1 was benami and void under Section 4(1) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, and that the defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

1 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning 13...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Issues Judgment on Official Trustee's Petition Against MHADA Notice and Redevelopment Approvals — Matter Concerns Temple Property and Involves Heritage and Coastal Zone Regulations. The petition seeks setting aside of notice under Section 95-A of MHADA Act, building plans, and TDR certificate, while developer relies on Memorandum of Understanding and court orders.

6 Mar 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

19 Oct 2018

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

19 Mar 2015

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Land Grabbing Special Court Order in Land Dispute Case — Petitioner's Claim Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. The court held that the Special Court's finding of land grabbing by the petitioner was based on proper appreciation of evidence and did not warrant interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

26 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Sunitha, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment dated 15.04.2019 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Memo for Additional Issues in Suit for Partition and Injunction. Court Holds That Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Memo Without Considering Its Merits and That the Memo Was Not Barred by Res Judicata or Constructive Res Judicata.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in O.S. No.30/2007 pending before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Gowribidanur, filed a suit for partition...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)