Search Results for "bailiff affidavit"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Goa University Against Injunction in Easement Dispute. Right of Way Claim Upheld Based on Long User and Necessity Under Indian Easements Act, 1882.

The case involves an appeal by Goa University (original defendants) against an order dated 24.06.2016 passed by the District Judge-1, North Goa, Panaj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit — Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC Requires Strict Compliance with Conditions for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Purnendu Shekharmal Jain, was the original defendant in Summary Suit No. 2539 of 2012 filed by M/s ACG Associated Capsules P Ltd. An ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Executing Court’s Dismissal of Obstruction Applications Filed Under Order 21 Rule 97 and 99 CPC. Decree for Eviction Executed; Objectors Failed to Prove Possession at Time of Delivery.

The revision petitions arose from the execution of eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court in three eviction petitions filed by the decree h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Lack of Proper Service of Summons. Delay of 164 Days Condoned as Defendant Demonstrated Good Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order XXXVII of CPC, 1908.

The plaintiff, Fountainhead Promotions & Events Pvt Ltd, filed a Summary Suit No. 874 of 2010 against the defendant, Gitanjali Lifestyle Limited, clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Gender-Discriminatory Amendment to CPC Service Rule. Bombay Amendment to Order V Rule 15 CPC Held Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional for Restricting Service to Adult Male Members Only.

The case arose from a Letters Patent Appeal where the appellant sought to serve notice on respondent no.5. The bailiff returned the notice unserved be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

The case involves three appeals filed by the defendants (Smt. Malti Kapadia, Hemant Kapadia, and Vijaysingh Kapadia) against an order of the City Civi...