WRIT PETITION NO. 7985 OF 2005.
25 Jan 2006The petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged an order of the Second Labour Court, Thane, which allowed an applicatio...
Search Results for "award after expiry"
1364 result(s) found
Found 1364 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Application as Time-Barred. Limitation for Filing Application Under Section 34(3) Runs from Receipt of Award; Suit Filed Within Extended 30-Day Period Without Showing Sufficient Cause for Delay Cannot be Entertained.
26 Nov 2019This appeal arose from the dismissal of an arbitration suit filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Dismissal of Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred — Finding No Valid Service of Award Where Postal Endorsements Showed Addressee Not Found. Section 34 Petition Held Within Limitation as Limitation Commences Only from Actual Receipt of Award Copy Under Section 31(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 May 2018The appeal arose from a dispute over a software supply contract between the appellant, Logic Eastern India Pvt. Ltd., and the respondent, KEC Internat...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Award Made on Last Day of Two-Year Period from Section 6 Declaration Held Valid. Publication of Section 6 Declaration in Two Newspapers on Same Day as Gazette Notification Constitutes Substantial Compliance.
9 Oct 2015The petitioners, Govind Tukaram Shete and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition pro...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute. Petition Seeks Enforcement Under Section 48 of Arbitration Act; Allegations Include Breach of JVA and Conflict of Interest.
7 Jan 2019The petitioner, an Italian company engaged in cable manufacturing, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement dated 19th January 2010 with the respondents...
- 21
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.
4 Mar 2015The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Execution Application for Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Execution of Arbitral Award is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
25 Sep 2014The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., had granted a loan of Rs.3,95,000 to respondent No.1 for purchasing a tractor, with respo...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Cross Appeals in Part in Arbitration Dispute Over Interim Measures Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Clarifies That an Award Creditor Can Seek Interim Relief During Section 34 Proceedings to Secure the Award Amount.
31 Jul 2019The case involves cross appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arising from a common order dated 1 July 2019 passed by...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Petition for Extension of Bank Guarantee Pending Challenge to Arbitral Award — Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Post-award interim protection can be granted under Section 9 to preserve the subject matter of arbitration pending challenge to award.
15 Jun 2026The petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...
- 220
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Service of Arbitral Award Deemed Complete Upon Acknowledgment by Relative at Petitioner's Address.
30 Apr 2015The petitioners, Francisco A. D'Souza and the legal heirs of Oscar de Souza, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Con...
- 79
