KAHC010142892018_1
8 Dec 2025These cross-appeals arose from the Judgment and Award dated 19.01.2018 in MVC No. 758/2015 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mysuru. The ...
Search Results for "auto-rickshaw"
235 result(s) found
Found 235 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Claimant as Driver-cum-Owner Not Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that a claimant who is the driver-cum-owner of the offending vehicle cannot maintain a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the provision is intended for third parties and not for the owner/driver of the vehicle involved in the accident.
23 Jan 2023The present appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. challenging the judgment and award dated 11.09.2014 passed by the Principal Senior...
- 90
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 302 IPC Upheld Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive.
17 Nov 2021The State of Karnataka, through H.D. Kote Police Station, filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challengi...
- 110
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Death of Auto-Rickshaw Driver Due to Negligence of Another Vehicle. Multiplier applied as per Sarla Verma and future prospects added as per Pranay Sethi principles.
24 Jun 2019The appeal was filed by the claimants, being the wife, minor children, and mother of the deceased K.V. Ramanathan, who died in a motor vehicle acciden...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Drainage Dispute Case. Common Intention Established for Assault with Sticks and Axes Under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC.
5 Feb 2019The case arises from a dispute between two families over drainage water flowing from a cement road. About six months prior to the incident, there was ...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 363, 365 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellant shared common intention with co-accused to kidnap the minor victim.
16 Jul 2018The appellant, Salim Abbas Chaudhari, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 363 and 365 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pena...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, Extortion, and Destruction of Evidence. Conviction based on circumstantial evidence including CDRs, extra-judicial confession, and last seen evidence upheld.
13 Jun 2018The case involved two appeals before the Bombay High Court against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, convicting the appel...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Seeking Back Wages Despite Reinstatement — 'No Work No Pay' Principle Applied. Workman Never Joined Service, Hence Not Entitled to Back Wages Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
13 Jul 2012The petitioner, Tanaji D. Chavan, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 17th January 1998 passed by the Labour Court, which granted reinsta...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
11 Feb 2005The appellant, Bajirao Gondappa Chaugule, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Tanaji Ladgaonkar and sentenced to life imprisonment b...
- 96
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Limits Owner's Liability to Rs. 50,000 Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimants' Failure to Prove Negligence Renders Claim Under Section 166 Unsustainable; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication Under No-Fault Provision.
30 Nov -0001The present appeals arise out of a motor accident claim case. The appellant in First Appeal No.523 of 2016, Pawan s/o Gulchand Musale, is the owner of...
- 115
