Search Results for "authorized share capital"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Concealment of Income in Land Sale Transaction. Assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in return, leading to penalty for concealment.

The appellant-assessee, along with four others, executed an agreement for sale of a plot of land at Vasai on 07.12.2004 for a total consideration of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 'C' Summary Report in Cheating Case — Directs Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC. Court finds that the investigating officer failed to examine crucial documents and witnesses, rendering the summary report premature and based on incomplete investigation.

The petitioner, Dharmil Anil Bodani, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inquiry and Appointment of Authorized Officer Under MCS Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Prejudice or Violation of Natural Justice. Inquiry Under Section 83 is Fact-Finding; Opportunity at Section 88 Stage Sufficient.

The petitioner, Gulabrao Sakharam Shelke, a former director of the Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. (Respondent No.5), filed a writ petition u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Amalgamation of Five Transferor Companies with Unichem Laboratories Limited. Scheme held fair and reasonable under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956, despite shareholder objection.

The judgment concerns five Company Scheme Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 read with Sections 80, 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...