Search Results for "army rules"

178 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 178 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Armed Forces Pension Case, Upholding Terminal Benefits for Resigning Officer. Late Entrant Eligibility Under Regulation 15 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Applied as Officer Commissioned at Age 39 and Served 15 Years Before Resignation.

The dispute arose from the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing the Union of India to process terminal and pensionary benefits for a former Army Me...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Brigadier Challenging Non-Empanelment for Promotion to Major General. Selection Board's Assessment Based on Overall Reckonable Profile Within Batch Upheld as Fair and in Accordance with Army Promotion Policy.

The appellant, Brigadier Nalin Kumar Bhatia, was commissioned in the Indian Army in 1981 and promoted to Brigadier in 2008. His case for empanelment t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Grade Pay Parity for Army Officer in MES. Army Officer Cannot Claim Equal Grade Pay with Civilian Counterparts as IDSE Rules Exclude Tenure Appointments and Military Personnel Form a Distinct Class.

The appeal was filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Kolkata, which directed the Appellants t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Armed Forces Tribunal's Interference with Censure Punishment. The Court Held That the Tribunal Cannot Substitute Its Own Discretion for That of the Competent Authority in Awarding Censure Merely Because Different Forms of Censure Exist.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Ex-Sepoy Discharged on Medical Grounds Without Invalidating Board. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954 requires Invalidating Board; failure renders discharge illegal.

The appellant, Ex-Sepoy (Washerman) Ram Khilawan, was enrolled in the Indian Army on October 23, 1987. He was placed in permanent Low Medical Category...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Washerman Discharged on Medical Grounds Without Invalidating Board. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954 requires Invalidating Board recommendation; residual clause (v) inapplicable.

The appellant, Ex-Sepoy (Washerman) Ram Khilawan, was enrolled in the Indian Army on October 23, 1987. He was discharged from service on August 31, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Army Convict Challenging General Court Martial Conviction for Murder. Petitioner's life imprisonment and dismissal from service upheld as court martial proceedings were valid and no jurisdictional error found.

The petitioner, Arun Raj, an ex-serviceman of the Indian Army, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Cour...