Search Results for "area discrepancy"

464 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 464 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal and Allows Cross-Objection in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land.

The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnataka for a highway improvement project. The land belonging to Smt. Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Enhanced to Rs.66 per Square Metre for Konkan Railway Project. Comparable Sale Deeds of Nearby Land at Rs.64 and Rs.66 per Square Metre Form Basis for Valuation Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case arises from the acquisition of 23,900 square metres of land belonging to the appellant, Smt. Shrimati Vishwanath Acharya (since deceased, rep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhancement from ₹59.58 to ₹1235 per sq. mt. Upheld. Market value determined based on exemplar sale deeds and location of acquired land in Mapusa City.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the State (Land Acquisition Officer and Executive Engineer) against the judgment and award dated 9/02/2011 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...