Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

229 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 229 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time for Arbitration in Infrastructure Dispute Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Grants Six Months Extension for Completion of Pending Arbitration Proceedings with Consent of Both Parties.

22 Jan 2024

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Pass Award Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Substitute Arbitrator After Original Arbitrator Failed to Conclude Proceedings Despite Multiple Extensions.

16 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Madhav Structural Engineers Limited, filed a petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking term...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Render Award and Excessive Fees — Substitute Arbitrator Appointed Under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that failure to render award within reasonable time and demanding excessive fees constitute failure to act under Section 14(1)(a) of the Act.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Parekh Industries Limited, filed a petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking terminatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitral Tribunal Mandate for Unreasonable Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Condonation of delay set aside as claimant failed to show sufficient cause for 7-month delay.

15 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Wanbury Ltd., filed a petition under sections 14(1)(a), 14(2), and 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. District Court's Appointment of Sole Arbitrator Upheld as Petitioner's Non-Participation Caused Delay.

14 Sep 2022

The Petitioner, M/s. Magnum Opus IT consulting Private Limited, a company engaged in e-governance, challenged an order dated 03/02/2021 passed by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Refuses to Substitute Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Mandate Extension Petitions Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Allegations of Bias and Delay Based on Adverse Rulings in Related IHFL Arbitration Found Insufficient to Justify Drastic Substitution.

23 Apr 2025

The judgment concerned two arbitration petitions filed under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Indiabulls Infraestate Ltd....

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Termination of Arbitral Proceedings Under ICA Maritime Rules — Rule 20 Time Limit Not Absolute; Delay-Causing Party Cannot Insist on Termination. Arbitral Tribunal's Rejection of Termination Application Upheld as Party Which Caused Delay Through Interlocutory Applications Cannot Rely on Two-Year Limit Under Rule 20(1) of the Maritime Arbitration Rules.

20 Apr 2010

The case arose from a charter party executed on 6 November 2006 between Rashtriya Chemical Fertilizers Ltd., a public sector undertaking, and J.S. Oce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award — Time Limit in Consent Order Held Directory, Not Mandatory. Arbitrator's Mandate Did Not Terminate Automatically Upon Expiry of Four-Month Period Under Section 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 May 2006

The appeal arose from an order of a Single Judge dismissing a petition challenging an arbitral award dated 31.3.2004. The dispute originated from Suit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for De Facto Inability to Perform Functions. Arbitrator's Order Returning Statement of Claim and Rejecting Application for Termination of Mandate Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction.

27 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Amar Tea Distributors, a partnership firm, entered into a Distributor Agreement with the respondent, Coca-Cola India Pvt. Ltd., on 7th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Demise of Arbitrator and Insolvency of Party Held Sufficient Cause for Extension Despite Lack of Consent Under Section 29-A(3).

6 Feb 2025

The petitioners, Scape Marketing Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)