High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "appeal under Section 154"
1473 result(s) found
Found 1473 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Direction to Reconsider Development Permission in MRTP Act Appeal — Minister Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 47 by Converting Appeal into Representation. The Court Held That the Minister Cannot Issue Directions Beyond the Scope of the Statutory Appeal and Must Decide the Appeal on Merits.
1 Nov 2018The petitioner, Sunil Balakrushna Telang, owned plot nos. 11 and 12 in a private layout in Survey No.110, Village Ravet, within the Pimpri Chinchwad M...
- 72
High Court
Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Revenue’s Appeals Against Single Judge’s Order Quashing Section 153C Notices; Weighs Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Natural Justice Concerns.
22 Jan 2024The present judgment arises from a batch of writ appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order dated 12.08.2022 passed by a Single Judge of the ...
- 12
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.
25 Mar 2015The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.
17 Oct 2018These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance in Suit Involving Subsequent Purchasers. The trial court had decreed specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands, directing the original vendor and later purchasers to execute a joint sale deed.
11 Oct 2013The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands. The first defendant, the owner, agreed to sell the ...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Domestic Violence Case — Sets Aside Appellate Order for Non-Compliance with Section 29 of D.V. Act. Appellate Court Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing to Complainant Before Setting Aside Conviction Order.
2 Jul 2025The petitioner, Smt. Roopa B.C., filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (D.V. Act) against her ...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Dispute Under Maharashtra Trust Act. Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC Alleges Bar of Suit by Sections 22, 50, 51, 70 of Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950.
10 Jul 2019The dispute centered on the expulsion of two trustees from a trust registered under the Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950. The applicants, comprising ten in...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 120B r/w 302 IPC. Conviction Stemmed from Alleged Conspiracy to Murder Inder Bhatija by Accused No.1 and Others.
14 Oct 2014The appeal arose from the conviction and sentence of accused No.1 Pappu @ Suresh Budharmal Kalani by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.
14 Jun 2011The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...
- 10
