Search Results for "apartment buyer agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "apartment buyer agreement"

44 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Flat Possession -- NCDRC Orders Upheld for Completion, Compensation, and Costs Under Consumer Protection Act

20 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court addressed three civil appeals arising from NCDRC orders in consumer complaints filed by flat buyers against Parsvnath Developers Ltd...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Delayed Possession in Fiesta Homes Project. The Supreme Court mandates compensation for homebuyers, correcting NCDRC's oversight of the construction agreement's possession date.

22 Jul 2024

The appellants, along with proforma respondents, filed a complaint against the first respondent-builder for delay in handing over possession of flats ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Orders Forensic Audit and Status Quo in Real Estate Project Dispute Over Fund Siphoning Allegations. The Court Approved Forensic Audit Findings That the Amrapali Group Controlled the La-Residentia Project and Diverted Buyer Funds, Leading to Interim Relief for Apartment Buyers Under Writ Petition (Civil) No. 940 of 2017.

29 Jun 2022

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil original jurisdiction matter, addressed a dispute concerning the Amrapali La-Residentia real estate project. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

7 Dec 2021

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Condominium Association for Lack of Locus Standi Under Consumer Protection Act. Statutory Body Formed Under Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 Is Not a Voluntary Consumer Association or Consumer Under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Sobha Hibiscus Condominium, is a statutory body formed under the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972, comprising owners of apartmen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Housing Board's Appeal in Consumer Dispute — Liability for Mental Harassment and Litigation Costs Apportioned 70:30 Between Developer and Housing Board; Interest Rate Reduced to 9% p.a. The Court held that Clause 9(c) of the Tripartite Agreement does not cover mental harassment or litigation costs, and the interest rate should remain at 9% p.a. as per the agreement and earlier orders.

17 Dec 2019

The appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by Respondent No. 2 (a flat buyer) against M/s. Parasvanath Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Developer) and Cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Suit — Upholds Refusal to Strike Out Defence Under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days. The court held that the power to strike out defence is discretionary and not automatic, and that non-disclosure of defence under Order 6A Rule 3 CPC does not justify striking out.

21 Dec 2017

The present appeals arise from a suit filed in 1987 by Behram Nowrosji Gamadia and Jehangir Dhan Mistri (original plaintiffs) against several defendan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to MOFA Amendments and Upholds Conveyance Order — Amendments to Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 by Act No.4 of 2008 are intra vires and Competent Authority's order directing conveyance is valid as promoter failed to execute conveyance within statutory period.

17 Oct 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Siddharth Construction, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Maharashtra Ow...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Appeals by Commercial Space Buyers in CIRP of IP Constructions Pvt. Ltd. — Resolution Plan Must Include Allottees' Claims. The Tribunal held that commercial space allottees are 'financial creditors' under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and their claims must be considered in the resolution plan.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment arises from three appeals filed by commercial space allottees against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Principal Bench...

Tribunals

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appeals by Homebuyers Associations Against NCLT Order Rejecting Impleadment in CIRP — Allottees Held to Be Financial Creditors Under IBC Entitled to Be Heard. The Tribunal directed impleadment of the associations in the pending application before the Adjudicating Authority to ensure their right to be heard is protected.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves four appeals filed by two residents' associations (Sharon Hills Residents Association and Angelwoods Apartments Allottees Associatio...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)