Search Results for "amenity plot"

68 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building Under MHADA and MCGM Regulations — Held That Occupiers Have No Right to Insist on Repair When Building is Unsafe.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Grace Estate Development Venture and by residents of Ashish Building No. 21 CHS Ltd challenging the demo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Writ Petition for TDR Against Construction of Development Plan Road. Municipal Corporation's Rejection of TDR Application Set Aside as Unreasonable and Contrary to Development Control Regulations.

The petitioner, M/s. Siddhi Real Estate Developers, a partnership firm, constructed a development plan road at its own cost within the limits of Thane...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC Plot Allotments — No Arbitrariness Found in Allotment Process. Petitioner's claim for allotment based on alleged earmarking fails as no legal right established.

The petitioner, Vikrant Industries, a sole proprietorship, filed a writ petition under Articles 226, 14, and 19 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...