Search Results for "alcoholic"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tilaknagar's Injunction Claim in Trademark Passing Off Dispute Over MANSION HOUSE and SAVOY CLUB. Court Holds That 1987 Agreements Ceding Trademarks Were Conditional and Revocable, and Tilaknagar Failed to Establish Exclusive Ownership.

The judgment arises from a commercial IPR suit involving a counterclaim by Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. (Tilaknagar) against Herman Jansen Beverages Ned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Liquor Vendors Are Not 'Buyers' Under Section 206C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that excise contractors acquiring arrack under state-controlled system are excluded from definition of 'buyer' under Explanation (a)(iii) of Section 206C.

The appeal arose from a dispute under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning tax collection at source on the sale of alcoholic liquor. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Refund of Excise Licence Fees Due to Delay and Laches. Claim for refund of Rs.2.86 Crores paid under Karnataka Excise (Rectified Spirits) Rules, 1967 for period 1997-98 to 2002-03 rejected as barred by delay and laches.

The petitioner, M/s. Kap Chem Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking refund of Rs.2.86 Crores paid as l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Issue Exemption Notification Under Section 25 of Customs Act, 1962 — No Fundamental Right to Exemption from Customs Duty. Budget Proposal Does Not Have Force of Law Until Enacted; Power Under Section 25 is Permissive, Not Mandatory.

The petitioner, Amin Merchant, imported eight consignments of goods classified under Tariff Heading 2208.10 of the Customs Tariff during financial yea...