Search Results for "advertising"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "advertising"

397 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 397 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against ITAT's Interpretation of Infrastructure Fee Entitlement; Assessee Contends for Allowance of 5% of Gross Advertising Bills Under Agreement. Interpretation of Clause-3 of Agreement Raises Substantial Question of Law Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

22 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from an assessment order for Assessment Year 1993-94 concerning the deduction claimed by the assessee, M/s. Star Time Communication (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Grant of Unconditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit — Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as Respondent Raised Triable Issues Including Subsequent Settlement Agreement and Validity of Electronic Evidence.

2 Sep 2024

The Petitioner, M/s. Mobile Arts S.A.L., a company incorporated in Lebanon providing digital advertising services, filed a Commercial Summary Suit (No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Lack of Willful Disobedience in IP Infringement Case. Court finds that the alleged new label/trade dress of the respondents was not identical or deceptively similar to the petitioner's FEVICOL MR artistic work, bottle, and glue pens, and thus did not violate the consent decree.

13 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Pidilite Industries Ltd., filed a contempt petition against the respondents, Premier Stationery Industries Pvt. Ltd. and others, alleg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by USV Pvt Ltd in Disparagement Cases, Upholds Injunction Against Comparative Advertising. The court held that disparaging a rival's product by implying it contains harmful ingredients without scientific basis constitutes unfair trade practice under Section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

13 Jul 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by USV Private Limited (USVPL) against a common order dated 16th June 2022 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. Registered Trademark 'RENAISSANCE' Found Infringed by 'SAI RENAISSANCE' Due to Deceptive Similarity and Transborder Reputation Under Section 29(4).

19 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a trademark infringement dispute between an appellant-plaintiff, a global hotel chain incorporated in Delaware, USA, and respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tender Award for LED Street Lighting Project — No Arbitrariness Found in Municipal Corporation's Decision to Award Contract to Lowest Bidder. The court held that the tender process was fair and transparent, and the petitioners failed to establish any violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioners, Shah Investments and Polycab Wires, challenged the decision of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation to award a contract for LED stree...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) Not Applicable When TDS Deducted and Paid Before Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1). The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance, holding that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) allows deduction if TDS is paid before the due date under Section 139(1).

28 Feb 2014

The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Agency Dispute — Retainer Fee Clause Interpreted as Monthly Payment Obligation. The court upheld the Arbitrator's finding that the Petitioner was liable to pay monthly retainer fees and fees during the notice period under the Company/Agency Agreement.

20 Jan 2014

The Petitioner, Maxx Moblink Pvt. Ltd., a company in the business of marketing and trading mobile phones, entered into a Company/Agency Agreement date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Quashing of Process in Tobacco Advertisement Case — Held That Complaint Under Section 5 of Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 Is Maintainable Against Individuals and Companies for Prohibited Advertisement of Tobacco Products. The Court restored the process issued by the Magistrate, finding that the Sessions Judge erred in quashing the process by conducting a mini-trial at the stage of process.

30 Jul 2010

The petitioner, National Organisation for Tobacco Eradication (NOTE), a registered society, filed a criminal complaint against the respondents (accuse...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)