Search Results for "advance refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "advance refund"

604 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

3 Sep 2025

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Refund Under Section 244A(1)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Refund Arising from Appellate Order Reducing Income Below Returned Income Qualifies for Interest Irrespective of 10% Threshold. The court held that Section 244A(1)(a) applies to refunds of advance tax, TDS, and self-assessment tax, and interest is payable from the date of payment, not from the date of assessment.

9 Feb 2024

The appellant, Ceat Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Refund Under Section 244A(1)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Refund Arising from Appellate Order Not Subject to 10% Threshold. The court held that the 10% threshold under Section 244A(1)(b) applies only to refunds of excess advance tax/TDS, not to refunds arising from appellate orders under Section 244A(1)(a).

9 Feb 2024

The appellant, Ceat Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (IT...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Immediate Refund of Undisputed Income Tax Refund Under Section 168(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Failure to Release Admitted Refund Despite Reminders Constitutes Arbitrary Action

18 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Group M Media India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court alleging failure by the respondents (income ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

3 Mar 2022

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that the condition of 'direct physical handling' of goods by the applicant is not a mandatory requirement under the Foreign Trade Policy and that the Policy does not prohibit third-party procurement or supply.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that denial of benefits under Para 4.1.5 of Foreign Trade Policy on ground of non-fulfillment of condition of minimum value addition is unsustainable as the condition was not applicable to the product in question.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Income Tax Refund Interest Case — Self-Assessment Tax Refund Eligible for Interest Under Section 244A(1)(b). Interest on refund of excess self-assessment tax paid under Section 140A is payable from the date of payment of such tax, not from the date of filing of return.

17 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Stock Holding Corporation of India Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28 September 1999 passed by the Commissioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Prospective Application of Section 234D. Interest Under Section 234D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Cannot Be Charged for Assessment Year 2002-03 as the Provision Applies Only From Assessment Year 2004-05.

12 Sep 2012

The appeal by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged an order dated 24/11/2010 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)